Getting the new computer in gear and going may be giving me a bit of a kick in
the butt to start my juices flowing again. And if I weren't so worthless and
lazy, plus hating traffic jams and crowds, I'd be gathering up an appropriate
kit to take tomorrow for "Angels over Atlanta." But, even though Dobbins ARB
is just over a hill or two from here, it's always a mob and a mess -- like a
million folks within a three- or four-mile radius.
Maybe they'll fly over here a time or two and I can at least get a glimpse
whilst doing the yardwork (fancy folks call it "gardening") that I have to get
done this weekend. Got the chainsaw gassed up and ready, and now I've got to
catch that damn goat. :-[
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Wow! Glad to hear it.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Walt Wayman wrote:
>
> >
> > But now to my real point. Photos look exactly the same on this
> > computer, after nearly no tweaking of settings, in either Photoshop,
> > Studio, or PWP. I just opened up a TIFF, saved from an E-1 RAW file,
> > in all three, and I can't tell any difference among them at all.
> > I've either benefited from the blind hog theory and done something
> > right, or I'm just living right this week.
> >
> > I'm absolutely astounded by how fast stuff works on this machine:
> > 3.2GZ dual core Pentium D, 2GB ram, and dual 250GB hard drives.
> > Using "advanced sharpening" in PWP on my laptop for a 30MB TIFF
> > usually takes about 20-30 seconds. On the new computer, it's
> > instant, barely a blink of the eye.
> >
> > Despite the previous rant, things are going much better now. :-]
> >
> > Walt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|