Manuel
No, your language is not a problem, only that there was a lot to take
in and the collection of photos did not look very promising initially
-- my problem, not yours.
I'll look at the full-size images, thanks. I did not think to try
that ;-) I think that it's fine to assume that people interested in
photography will have at least 1,000 pixels across their monitors ...
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 13 May 2006, at 19:28, Manuel Viet wrote:
> Le samedi 13 Mai 2006 19:52, Chris Barker a écrit :
>> I had to read your post a couple of times and then look through the
>> photos a couple of times to appreciate what you meant.
>
> I hope it's not because of my bad english ; I don't have much
> occasions to
> speak since a long time now, although I like english litterature.
>
>> I like the
>> mood as well. I think that some of the shots have too much contrast
>> and are too dark;
>
> I agree, the film is too hard, and I somehow messed the exposure. I
> don't
> remember (it's been a long time ago), but I very well may have left
> the
> exposure dial on a wrong iso setting. Pictures are equally hard to
> enlarge in
> a conventional wet lab.
>
>> the images are too small, really for viewing,
>
> (as some of my friends pointed me this defect of the gallery
> builder I use)
> did you notice that you can click twice in a row on the vignette to
> bring the
> final image (800 pixels wide or 600 pixels high, dependending on the
> orientation of the picture) ? That's a bit small for big screens,
> but there
> appears to be a consensus over this size among french photography
> discussions
> groups. So I bend to the law of majority, but prefer at least 1024x768
> myself.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|