You just don't understand the real criteria yet. Decide for infra-red
dust elimination above all else.
Chuck Norcutt
Philip Pemberton wrote:
> I've been offered a Minolta DiMAGE Scan Dual IV, which is 3200DPI and has
> 16-bit acquisition and multi-scanning. No infra-red dust elimination or
> anything like that, though.
> Dynamic range is specified to be 3.6 on the Minolta, vs. the Polaroid's 3.4.
> I
> guess this would mainly affect extraction of detail from shadow areas?
>
> I'm more interested in optical quality than anything else. The thing that's
> most off-putting about the Polaroid is that it's fixed-focus, while the
> Minolta has autofocus hardware (so in theory it should be able to get a
> better
> image off the film)...
>
> Seems there's far too many scanners to choose from, and no easy way to
> decide...
>
> Thanks.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|