AG Schnozz wrote:
>> My answer made a clear assumption based on the original
>> question: Truth to tell, only a small percentage of the
>> slides I've shot are worth scanning so I'm wondering if it
>> might not be better to let the pros do it.
>>
>
> Based on the specific question being asked, I don't disagree
> with your analysis. Of course, each of us have our definition
> of "small percentage" and "worth scanning". For me, this
> criteria amounts to over 2000 slides and untold negatives.
>
Well, my total isn't as big as yours, but still would cost a lot to have
scanned properly by someone else.
I did very subtly try to convey my suspicion that there are a lot more
shots worth scanning than Scott coyly admits to.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|