Well, durn it all! We were hoping you'd say it fits the 500/8 as well.
But I don't know where it would go.
Chuck Norcutt
Brian Swale wrote:
> Ho folks,
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> I wrote:
> This morning the conditions were also reasonably good, and over the course
> of about an hour I took 24 shots with the 500, 300, 200 and the Tok 135,
> varying on-camera contrast, saturation etc plus UV filter. I'm not at all
> satisfied yet.
>
> I found it very difficult to maintain the horizon at the correct angle; on the
> Manfrotto head there always seemed to be creep. Also with the Zuiko 300
> collar. I did manage to hold exposure value and recompose; but I'm not sure
> that this helped camera/lens stability. I have to work on stability with the
> 500.
> ..................
> Perhaps I should have written:-
> This morning the conditions were also reasonably good, and over the course
> of about an hour I took 24 shots with the 500mm, 300mm, 200mm and the
> Tok 135mm f/2.8, varying on-camera contrast, saturation etc plus UV filter.
> I'm not at all satisfied yet.
>
> I found it very difficult to maintain the horizon at the correct angle; on the
> Manfrotto head there always seemed to be creep. Also with the Zuiko
> 300mm using the tripod collar. I did manage to hold exposure value and
> recompose; but I'm not sure that this helped camera/lens stability. I have
> to
> work on stability with the 500/8.
> ...........................
>
> Does that clarify? The tripod collar was on the Zuiko 300/4.5 only
>
> Brian
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|