And I agree too - mine is "clearly" not linear, but cirular with the two
portions at 90 degrees to one another. I also was surpised - in fact Walt,
I owe you an apology as I assumed your one word response was a play on
words. It might have been, but it was also correct!
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Walt Wayman
Sent: 12 July 2006 23:13
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Filters for T-10
My thinking exactly, and I was surprised upon examining mine to see that
both the inner and outer parts appear to be circular, i.e., only exhibiting
a polarizing effect in one direction, looking from the camera side. Must be
some reason.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I don't know but the instructions only identify usage on the OM-1 and
> OM-2. There wouldn't have been a need for a circular polarizer on
> either of those cameras. But even if it's linear it should work fine
> in auto mode on the later cameras. And you can't make a manual
> reading from the flash so you'll have to use it in auto mode in any
> case. In short, I don't think it makes any difference.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Johann Thorsson wrote:
>
> > Hi you gurus, I am wondering if the polarizer filter for the T-10
> > ringflash is linear or circular, does anybody know that?
> >
> > J
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|