Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Kiron 28mm f2.8 for OM---worth getting for very little?

Subject: [OM] Re: Kiron 28mm f2.8 for OM---worth getting for very little?
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:09:27 -0400
As I think someone else mentioned here, Kiron was started by ex Nikor 
(Nikon) lens designers.

___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com  |  omtech1 AT verizon.net


Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Kiron is the lens brand name of Kino Precision (now defunct).  Kino 
> Precision started life as a manufacturer of lenses for other companies. 
>   Those that had a design house but no manufacturing house such as Vivitar.
> 
> They existed very quietly for a number of years before finally venturing 
> to produce their own designs (and some supposedly pirated designs from 
> the likes of Vivitar) under their own Kiron name.
> 
> But Kiron lenses were premium lenses.  When bought new they were very 
> expensive.  Most Kirons did not compete with OEM lenses on the basis of 
> price but on speed and optical performance.  They were more like 
> Vivitar's Series 1 line.  Today, nobody knows who they are or were and 
> the lenses sell for a song.  Most have exceptional optical performance 
> for the day.
> 
> If you own a Zuiko 70-150 I urge you to try the equivalent Kiron 70-150 
> f/4.  Assuming you don't mind a one-touch zoom you might not go back. 
> Just make sure you get one that's pristine and also includes the 
> plastic, reversible hood and soft leather case which can be hard to find 
> otherwise.  You can probably get one for $30 if you're patient.
> 
> But when buying Kiron (or any Japanese lens of the era) watch out for 
> the dreaded zoom creep on one-touch zooms and sticky diaphragms. 
> They're related.  The reason the zoom is creeping is reduced viscosity 
> of the helicoid and zoom mechanism grease.  The reason the diaphragm is 
> sticking is that the helicoid grease has turned to oil and is flowing 
> onto the apertuere blades.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> Jeff Keller wrote:
> 
> 
>>Good evening Mike,
>>
>>I've never owned  a Kiron other than the 105 macro which I haven't tested 
>>yet. I believe Chuck Norcutt liked and used Kiron lenses. I think that Kiron 
>>made an f2 wide angle lens that when it shows up sells in the $50 to $75 
>>range. I would recommend you send an email to Chuck asking him if he knows 
>>anything about the various Kirons. Chuck is the only one that I think has 
>>regularly talked about different Kirons. Of course Moose is always promoting 
>>his Kiron 105mm macro. I think AG Schnoze or someone made some comments 
>>about Kiron color rendition years ago (slightly cooler than Zuikos?). The 
>>vague impression that I've picked up is that the Kirons were typically a 
>>good buy. I never got the impression that they offered anything the Zuikos 
>>didn't offer except a lower price. Keep in mind you can probably buy a Zuiko 
>>28/3.5 for $30. Even the 28/2.8 seems to be sold for down around $50 from 
>>time to time.
>>
>>-jeff
>>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz