Moose wrote:
> Jeff Keller wrote:
>> I agree that the correction went too far.
> As do I. The light is all wrong. If the sun is only just lighting the
> peaks, how can the barn, etc. be lit so much brighter than the lower slopes?
>
> As others have said, I see this shot as being about the sunrise first,
> then about the foreground. Sure the foreground is blah, but it doesn't
> have to look like it was pasted in from another shot at a different time
> of day.
>> This and some of the corrections
>> Moose does to see how far he can push an image have a "picture postcard"
>> llook that would probably sell well but looks too artificial to my eye.
>>
> You rang? Actually, I'd be a bit ashamed to have posted the corrected
> shot in the tutorial.
>
> Here are a couple of versions that I think better capture the sunrise
> feeling while bringing the foreground out of the blahs
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/052206_big.htm>.
Way better.
I prefer the first level 'alternate' but even the 'dramatic' one is
believable. (Click to get that one.)
Thanks for taking the time to show how it should have been done.
--
Russ Butler (NJ USA)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|