Here's some help. Instead of spending $2200 for a 150 f/2 lens how
about $899 for this 135mm f/2 lens.
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=112539&is=USA&addedTroughType=search>
Then when you mount it on this body
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=397314&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
and crop out an equivalent center section you may find (as did Moose)
that the cropped image was better than the smaller sensored camera due
to higher quality big pixels.
I dunno. But it could be.
Chuck Norcutt
Walt Wayman wrote:
> I'm all worked up about the allegedly forthcoming E-3, which I,
> perhaps irrationally and unreasonably, expect to be -- well, I expect
> it to be just what I expect it to be, which is probably the same as
> what I hope it will be. This has caused me once already today, and
> once yesterday, to come within an eyelash of letting a twitchy mouse
> finger tap the "Add to Cart" button on the B&H website for the 150/2
> DZ. The price has come down, and I keep getting a tingly feeling in
> my Fruit of the Looms when I think about a 300mm f/2 (35mm
> equivalent) lens less than 7 inches long and weighing only 3 and a
> half pounds. If I buy it now, I'll have time to sell some stufff and
> replentish the camera coffers between now and September. Or October.
> Or November. Or next year.
>
> I need help. Is there a meeting anywhere near anytime soon?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|