NSURIT wrote:
> Does he have the 300mm f2.8? That would be nice. Someone
> else would need to sacrifice their backpack real estate as
> mine is full and I've already let my needs and desires
> decide what stays and what goes. The most significant is
> that with the e-1 my widest DZ that made the traveling squad
> is the 14-54mm.
I'm suprised that the 7-14 isn't coming. I can think of some
landscape shots where that would really come in handy.
If we were smart, we'd eliminate some of the duplication.
There'll be four 14-54 lenses between us. But at least they are
pretty lightweight. I'm not sure how many 50-200 zooms will be
coming, but probably two or three. The old-timers (silvernose
lenses) will fill a few slots in my bag. At the moment, I've got
enough room in the bag for another E-1 with 14-54. Don't get
any bright ideas, though.
There is a big benefit to owning the pedestrian F2.8 Zuikos.
They're a lot smaller and lighter than the F2 monstrosities. ;)
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|