Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Oh no!

Subject: [OM] Re: Oh no!
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:07:50 +0100
I found Fuji Press 800 to be pretty forgiving of a similar error, Mike.  It
is worth the try! 

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Mike
Sent: 20 August 2006 19:40
To: 1 Olympus Digest
Subject: [OM] Oh no!


Popped out the roll of what was supposed to be NPS160 and low and behold it
was an old roll of Fuji Press 1600. The eyes aren't what they used to be. Is
it worth even bothering to pay for having it developed? FWIW most of the
photos were taken on a dark, rainy day. I'm afraid all the cloudy highlites
will be beyond recovery and the shadows too grainy.

mike


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz