I am just the opposite. Anti-shake enables me to take pictures that I
would not ordinarily be able to and improves my percentage with a
long lens. Maybe it is just me, but I see no benefit of live preview
over the SLR optical view. It seems a novelty that has no practical
use. Good sensor, lenses and construction are important.
>>
>> IS will make its way with the brand new E-xx and very unlikely to
>> be seen in
>> the E-3 or even the E-2. Olympus maintains a very pure stand on
>> this issue.
Sorry, but this purity thing smacks of the same kind of convenient
rationalization that explained why OM lenses could not be used on a
digital camera.
I think I will let this thread alone. Hope the E-3 is a wonderful
camera and soon.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Aug 29, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Komtanoo Pinpimai wrote:
> Neither do I, what I really want see in the E-future are low noised
> ccd, good constuction, liveview or some new innovative features. I've
> never owned a liveview but I think it's a super cool technology making
> DSLR possible to shoot in awkward situtations. However, I believe,
> camera without anti-shake is harder to sell than another, sooner or
> later it'll become a standard component of modern camera like auto
> focus.
>
> -kem
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|