Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Incident vs reflected, was olympus Digest V3 #236

Subject: [OM] Re: Incident vs reflected, was olympus Digest V3 #236
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:21:15 +0100
Dear me, no, Chuck!  It's a good thing I don't do incident metering  
much:-)  But see my reply to the venerable Walt.

Chris

On 3 Sep 2006, at 16:09, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Didn't read your Sekonic manual, eh?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> William
>>
>> I had to think about this for a while; then I took my light meter
>> (little Sekonic 308) outside ...
>>
>> You don't point the dome at the camera.  With the translucent dome
>> fitted over the sensor you point it at the light source to measure
>> _incident_ light.  If you want to measure _reflected_ light you
>> remove the the dome and point it at the subject.  How close to the
>> light source you point it is a matter of judgement; e.g. above the
>> horizon for the sun or below.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you might measure by pointing the meter at the
>> camera, unless you are photographing the camera ... :-)
>>
>> Chris


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz