Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: wikipedia - was RE: Re: Published!

Subject: [OM] Re: wikipedia - was RE: Re: Published!
From: iwert <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:30:14 +0200
http://www.olypedia.de/Hauptseite

is rather elaborate, however in german...

Iwert


Op 3-sep-06 om 19:16 heeft Jeff Keller het volgende geschreven:

>
> I'm not taking sides on the start of the mutation of this thread but I 
> love
> how comments can lead to interesting stories ...
> ... Schon scandal
> ... Atlanta nights
>
> surely wikipedia itself is the victim of at least one hoax. Looking 
> for an
> easy target I took a quick look at C*non:
>
> "Its original purpose was to research the development of quality 
> cameras".
> It is reassuring to know they weren't researching the development of 
> cameras
> without quality.
>
> OM system at first glance returns more info, but "list of C*non 
> products",
> "C*non EOS", "C*non EF lens mount", etc dwarfs OM. So if our 
> perception of
> the OM as the pinnacle of camera evolution is to have any substance in
> wikipedia, we do need to get busy adding info to Olympus OM !!!
>
> -jeff


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz