Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: lipstick on a pig?

Subject: [OM] Re: lipstick on a pig?
From: "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:31:39 -0700
The D.Zuiko 7-14 is quite noticeably wider than the Zuiko 18mm. The D.Zuiko 
11-22 is probably wide enough to make most people happy and is significantly 
cheaper than the 7-14. A fixed focal length 8 or 9mm lens would be a nice 
addition to the D.Zuiko line up.

I've been keeping an eye open for a super wide lens for my 5D. The only 
thing I've seen that looks very promising is the old manual focus N*kon 15mm 
f3.5 which seems to be selling at about $700. This Nikon seems to be 
sensitive to flare. There don't seem to be any 35mm lenses comparable to the 
7-14 D.Zuiko zoom. The Sigma 12-24(?) has soft corners.

If you're looking for something wider than the 11-22 but don't really 
need/want to go as wide as the 7-14, then the 7-14 likely looks 
prohibitively expensive. If you have an almost daily need to go as wide as 
possible, perhaps the only competition may be stitched images.

-jeff

----Original Message Follows----
From: "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Now that I have a competent dSLR (E-500), two lenses, and a flash, I've
started looking for other lenses. I love wide angles, so I looked at the
Olympus 7-14mm lens for this camera.

-snip

Shouldn't it cost a lot _less_ than a
comparable 35mm lens?

I checked Adorama's listing for Canon digital-specific lenses for their
APS-C sensor cameras. The comparable lens, a 10-22mm zoom, is $690. Not
$1690 -- $690. The closest 35mm lens is the Canon 16-35mm, for $1400.



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz