Winsor Crosby wrote:
> No argument there.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
> On Sep 16, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> There is a 15% improvement in theoretical resolution (sqrt
>> (16/12))-1 but as Moose has demonstrated recently with
>> his comparisons of the 300D and same size crops from the 5D
>> there is a lot more to image quality than the pixel count.
For some reason my copy of Chuck's message (partially quoted above) is
missing. I must have dumped it or something, so I cannot look it up.
My question is, "...a 15% improvement..." over what, please?
keith whaley
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|