ML Archiv: [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3

Subject:	[OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3
From:	swisspace <swisspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:47:40 +0200

The solution is obvious :- I am still waiting for the day when they 
develop a sensor with variable sized pixel sensors, but will they listen 
?!! ;-)

IanW
> size.  Digital noise has a disturbing regularity.
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, (continued) [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chris [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Jón Ragnarsson [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Rob Harrison [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Moose [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Rob Harrison [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, C.H.Ling [OM] M42 lenses, Ali Shah [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, swisspace <= [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Moose [OM] Re: frustrations: was Monopod, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: frustrations: was Monopod, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: frustrations: was Monopod, Tim Randles [OM] Re: Monopod, Ali Shah

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Olympus USA says no to E-400?, Philippe Le Zuikomane
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Moose
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Chuck Norcutt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]