I haven't paid much attention to this thread to this point, so
apologies if this question is redundant -- might the E-400 be a
manifestation of the "cameras for ladies" that Olympus mentioned a
while back?
Inquiring minds and all that . . ./ScottGee1
On 9/18/06, Christos Stavrou <christos.stavrou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Another very good preview with detailed photos of the E-400 can be found here:
> http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/olympuse400/
>
> There is also a comparison with the competing D80, 400D, and A100 from
> the other brands
>
> The compact size of E-400 is a big plus for me, which makes it
> attractive -even to think to try digital (mainly for events), but this
> camera doesn't really compare to an OM-4, apart its size, does it?
>
> According to the editor of the article there ''Olympus seem to focus
> more on the compact camera user that wants to take the step to a DSLR,
> but is reluctant to miss out on the user convenience of a compact and
> light-weight digital camera''.Is it really so?
>
> CS
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|