Exactly why I'm thinking they misunderstood the original question.
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I don't believe it. There was too much thought put into making the E-1
> a professional's tool. With a rugged body and dust and water seals it's
> hard to believe they wouldn't protect the camera against at least the
> T-32 or the most popular professional flashes around, the Vivitar 283's
> and 285's where even the low voltage versions run about 12 volts just
> like the T-32. Not to mention some of the high voltage studio flash
> units still kicking around. Even 200 volts is too low for some units.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> John Hermanson wrote:
>
>
>>So, if you put a QA310 flash on an e body, (like 90v trigger coil)
>>you're gonna blow up the flash contacts? Not good if this is ture.
>>
>>___________________________________
>>John Hermanson
>>Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
>>21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
>>631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
>>http://www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
>>
>>
>>Richard Ociepka wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Moose wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Richard Ociepka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Our E-series cameras will only withstand a maximum trigger voltage of 6
>>>>>volts."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Isn't this in direct contradiction to another quoted response from Oly
>>>>on the same subject just a couple of weeks ago?
>>>>
>>>>Moose
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, it is. I think it is a case of Olympus covering their butt.
>>>
>>>Dick
>>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|