Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: I ain't got my panties balled up about the e-400, yet . . .

Subject: [OM] Re: I ain't got my panties balled up about the e-400, yet . . .
From: iwert <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:24:40 +0200

Hello Walt,

if you've got some money burning in your pockets,

for 30.000 $ you can have this small pocketcam, only 160.000.000 pixels
and 500 to 10000 asa:

<http://www.roundshot.ch/xml_1/internet/de/application/d438/d925/ 
f934.cfm>

this should be the correct link...
iwert.
>
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: NSURIT@xxxxxxx
>>
>> 2) Assuming Olympus doesn't announce a replacement for the e-1, my
>> question
>> is, "Which of the Can*n digital full frame bodies should a
>> disappointed
>> Olympus  customer look at as either a transition body for moving to
>> the Can*n
>> system
>> or  to give them a full frame digital solution for their OM lenses."
>>
>> So, that is what is on my mind as we approach Photokina.   <{8^)
>> Bill Barber


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz