I agree about 486 ... very nice. I actualy like both indoor shots more than
the outdoor one.
The most success I've had with outdoor super wide shots is when the image is
printed at a very large size and viewed relatively close up. which is sort
of cheating since the apparent viewing distance is then closer to the real
view.
-jeff
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
John,
486 is a stunning indoor photo. Beautifully done.
Joel W.
On 9/22/06, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Taken outdoors with the 7-14
> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/453.html
>
> Taken indoors with the 7-14
> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/486.html
> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/487.html
>
> Taken with the 14-45 zoom
> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/504.html
> Notice the barrel distortion. This is one reason I am looking for a
better
> option than the 14-45 zoom.
> The 11-22 looks to be the better choice.
>
> John Hudson
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|