Forgot to mention... can be seen here
<http://www.chucknorcutt.com/temp/after%233.jpg>
Just noticed that the hightlights aren't the same size but I'm not gonna
fuss with it any more. The technique seems to work.
Chuck Norcutt
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Actually, it only worked for her left eye (on the right). It worked
> farily well for the right eye too but left a very light gray arc over
> the top of the pupil where the originai is brightest. Easily corrected,
> however, with a little bit of dark gray paint sampled from the
> surrounding area.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, that works but I had to leave my feathering at 1 pixel to keep from
>>losing the color in the iris. Probably my original selection was larger
>>than yours.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>>Donald wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Chuck, you're right enough, it didn't work too well.
>>>
>>>So I made a selection, feathered it, desaturated it, darkened it down
>>>in levels. Then applied a contrast/lightness adjustment to very dark
>>>grey.
>>>
>>>Of course, I then binned it, without saving. So you'll have to take my
>>>word for it..! ;-)
>>>
>>>I find it usually works pretty well for small prints and web images,
>>>though. Extra refinements are obviously necessary for bigger images
>>>and vain persons...
>>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
