Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: "(...) the fastest macro lenses for 35mm full-frame photography

Subject: [OM] Re: "(...) the fastest macro lenses for 35mm full-frame photography today (...)" (RANT)
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 03:18:18 -0700
Walt Wayman wrote:
> Anyone who wears corrective lenses of any sort probably wastes money buying 
> top-of-the-line binoculars, and definitely so if those corrective lenses are 
> in the form of eyeglasses. After getting by with the Jason 7x35 binoculars, 
> two pairs of which my father and I bought for football watching and deer 
> hunting back about 1960, three years ago I decided I might be able to afford 
> something a little more better.
>
> I examined closely all of the following marques of the 7 or 8x40+ sort: 
> Swarovski, Zeiss, Leupold, Leica, Nikon, and Steiner. Oh, almost forgot: 
> Olympus. Ended up buying the Olympus 8x42 Magellans. Just couldn't see much 
> difference between them and the high-priced ones, and sure as shootin' not 
> hundreds of dollars' worth. And they're waterproof, just like the E-1.
>   
Dangerous as it may be, I feel compelled to disagree somewhat. For most 
uses, I agree. And I agree is is very difficult to see differences just 
by looking around through a bunch of glass at the store or out on the 
sidewalk of parking lot. With good light and the sun not behind the 
subject, they all look a lot alike and my eyes, at least, tire quickly 
of the game.

When looking for subtle detail in small creatures at a distance, it does 
make a difference, based on my experience. Looking up into a tree with 
bright overcast behind it, I was able to see enough detail to identify a 
Xanthus hummingbird with my B&L Waterproof Elites, but could not see the 
detail with a very good, but not absolutely top, other pair of 
binoculars. Other top models would undoubtedly do the job too, but not 
the cheaper ones. When looking seriously, I take off the glasses and set 
the diopter to my pre known 'spot'.

Winsor Crosby wrote:
> For what its worth, I had a pair of Leitz binoculars, the 8x40s, and  
> was glad to get the settlement when they were stolen. They had a  
> disturbing color fringe that was never seen on the inexpensive Pentax  
> and Nikon binocs I have used since.
My ancient seeming Leitz 8x35Bs were still as good as any other 
non-phase coated roofs I tried, although it's been a while since I was 
shopping. They are still my everyday, light and easy binocs. Just easy 
to look through, no strain. Besides, they make me look like I've been 
birding forever. :-)

Moose

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz