Excellent!
Chuck Norcutt
AllanDan wrote:
> The stage shots are very well done, but are not really low-lighting, but
> selective lighting. There is a reason to make the difference. Stage
> spots are actually quite strong, and if you meter for the highlights and
> allow the shadows to fall where they may, you will get little noise
> (digital) or grain (film). The noise and grain associated with low-light
> photography is really, in large part, merely due to prolonging the
> exposure time long enough to allow the highlights to invade the shadows.
> They do so in a defused manner that causes weak, grainy shadows.
> Unless one wants grainy, defused shadows as a special effect, one ought
> to meter for the high-lights and forget attempting to give the shadows
> greater detail. A pop of fill-flash is the only way to get more shadow
> detail without running into the problem of noise.
>
> Here is an example of a noiseless shot:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/10735492@N00/240342415/
>
> Allan
>
>
>
> Ali Shah wrote:
>
>>Not sure if you have seen this guys work but he seems
>>to have some awesome shots in low light.
>>
>>http://www.zwo5.de/
>>
>>He is quite popular on the MY FOUR THIRDS site I
>>guess.
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|