Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Bad attitudes and Olympus Rants

Subject: [OM] Re: Bad attitudes and Olympus Rants
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:08:32 +0800
You didn't catch my points of poor lens and scanner selection. Ok, it was a 
Canon, it must be good.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:00 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Bad attitudes and Olympus Rants


>A similar problem cropped up in the 28mm lens test I conducted (or tried
> to) recently.  The cropped section from one lens looked decidedly less
> crisp than from another lens.  But it was probably my poor technique in
> processing the raw images.  When looking at the JPEG's processed by the
> camera the situation was reversed.
>
> In any case my eyes are obviously different.  When I look at Reichmann's
> test of the D30 and Provia scan I don't see any real differences other
> than color and a bit of contrast and, perhaps signfificant, some
> mottling of the image due to grain.  I sometimes think people interpret
> grain as detail.  Sorry, but I guess I prefer "plastic".
>
> Chuck Norcutt


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz