Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: re Kodak !!

Subject: [OM] Re: re Kodak !!
From: "Brian Huber" <bhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:17:52 -0400
Pittsburg Camera is BAD NEWS!

Regards,
Brian Huber 
Brian P. Huber
Safety Products Manager
Northwest Controls, division of Crescent Electric
phone: 937-902-9991

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:38 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: re Kodak !!

Yes, because it probably doesn't count the other 5 or 10 percent they 
brow beat into withdrawing their nasty feedback.  I consider 98% 
posititive the minimum I'll deal with.

Trust me in this case.  These folks are anything but honest.

Chuck Norcutt

ScottGee1 wrote:

> Huh?  95.1% positive is "bad"?
> 
> Sheesh!  Or are we grading on a curve?
> 
> ScottGee1
> 
> On 10/10/06, Ali Shah <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>8-)) Have you seen the feedback? Even some of the
>>shady camera shops out of NYC dont have feedback that
>>bad!



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz