Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Digital lenses WAS: Re: E-500

Subject: [OM] Digital lenses WAS: Re: E-500
From: Jim Couch <Zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:22:11 -0700
For me one other issue is the availability of wider angle lenses. I 
routinely shoot with wide angles, particularly in the 21 and 24mm range 
so it complicates life when contemplating the switch to digital. (unless 
one has the bucks for a full frame DSLR - which I don't!) The amount of 
choices of wide angle lenses with a 24-21mm equivalent are pretty 
limited. With the typical 'multiplication' factor of most DSLRs 
telephoto lenses are not a huge issue, but wide angles are. For me this 
has been one of the driving factors when contemplating digital. (the 
other two are viewfinders & battery life.)

Jim Couch

Chuck Norcutt wrote:

>You neglected to note John's comment on lens speed.  The Canons at f/4 
>and f/4.5-5.6 don't compare very favorably to both Zuiko's f/2.8-3.5. 
>That's why in my response I tried to find lenses that could cover the 
>full range at a constant f/2.8.  You can do it but it takes three lenses 
>instead of two and a pack burro to carry it all around.
>
>Of course, the 5D can handle a couple more notches on the ISO dial so a 
>stop or two slower on the aperture is more readily handled.
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>Jeff Keller wrote:
>  
>
>>C*non 24-105/4 + 100-400/4.5-5.6 ?
>>
>>Probably DOF options would be as good with the FF C*non as the Zuiko
>>due to the format size. C*non has the ISO advantage, so exposure
>>shouldn't be an issue.
>>
>>Oh ... there was a mention of actually being able to carry the lenses.
>>OK advantage to the Zuikos. Actually the 24-105 doesn't look too bad
>>for weight.
>>
>>-jeff
>>
>>On 10/12/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>You're right about only two lenses for the equivalent of 28-400 and both
>>>are 2.8-3.5 so they're pretty good on speed.  I had gotten used to doing
>>>the equivalent of 28-200 with the Minolta A1's 2.8-3.5 lens.  I thought
>>>long and hard about this weight and lens change issue before throwing in
>>>the towel on 4/3's.
>>>
>>>Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>>John Gettis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I feel the same way about the E-500.  I like the fact that I can carry the
>>>>camera and 2 lenses and be covered from 28mm-400mm.   I don't think you can
>>>>do that with any other system and have the lenses speed the Olympus lenses
>>>>have.  Now I could be wrong on that but don't think so Just my 2 cents
>>>>worth
>>>>        
>>>>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz