Please remind me -- why does the 40/2.0 seem to command such a premium
over the 50/1.8 and 50/1.4? Gary's tests seem to indicate it's not
very good wide open whereas the 50/1.4 is quite good at f/2.0. Is it
the wider view? Rarity?
Inquiring minds and all that . . .
ScottGee1
On 11/6/06, Allan Mee <bigalsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The OM2(n) body seems in good condition too.
> Allan
>
> PS No trees were harmed in the sending of this message and a very large
> number of electrons were asked their permission to be terribly
> inconvenienced. (And threw a party for them afterwards for being really cool
> about it).
>
> Disrupting the unnatural balance that you, as a conscious human being and a
> confused mass of energy, have created.
> -Disturb the mind -
>
>
>
>
> >From: NSURIT@xxxxxxx
> >Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> >To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [OM] 40mm f2 at decent price. Oh, body attached. eBay BIN $325
> >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 06:43:37 EST
> >
> >
> >Title line pretty much says it all. #120049604946. Hot shoe plug included.
> ><[8^) Bill Barber
> >
> >
> >==============================================
> >List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> >List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> >==============================================
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
> http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|