Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and do

Subject: [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . .
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:01:25 -0500
Thanks.  I did briefly browse that page but didn't pay it much attention.

Chuck Norcutt

Richard M. Smith wrote:

> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>>I dunno.  Got a reference?
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>AG Schnozz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>However he hasn't demonstrated that that is the case for a 
>>>>D200/5D comparison and, even if it is, you may be right about
>>>>there being no disecernable difference at 16x20 or whatever
>>>>is the relevant print size for your sales.
>>>
>>>Hah, didn't somebody's test show that 8x10's from the 5D were
>>>much sharper than D200 prints?  Something like 100% of the
>>>people could pick out the 5D 8x10s?
>>>
>>>AG-give me a break-Schnozz
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
> 
> 
> 
> You probably have already seen this.
> 
> http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Nikon-D200-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Head-to-Head-Review-/Performance--Image-Quality.htm
> 
> Dick Smith



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz