rbinnj wrote:
> Here are a few shots from October and November. (All on Fuji 400 superia
> & costco scans with minimal/no tweaking.)
>
> http://nfs.nfshost.com/pics06/6J21R/08.HTM
> OM-2SP & an old toyo optics 28-80 2.8-4 @~28
> I'm very fortunate to have scenes like these at and near my home in (of
> all places) New Jersey.
>
Lovely composition. I very much like the way the elements are arranged.
'Twere mine, I'd be doig some messing with the midrange tonalities - but
you knew that. :-)
> These were made with an OM-4:
>
> http://nfs.nfshost.com/pics06/6J23R/20.HTM
> 50/1.8 mij
> (Sleeping puppies are like shooting ducks in a barrel :-)
>
If you like that sort of thing. ;-)
> http://nfs.nfshost.com/pics06/6J28R/14.HTM 85/2 @~2.8
>
Close to a great shot. The blob of OOF foliage in the lower left
detracts some for me. When the highlights get this far out of control,
they take important leaf/branch/twig detail with them. Prpbably mostly a
scan problem. It can be somewhat corrected even at that. One could do a
better job with a better, full size scan. I like the more saturated
colors from LCE, but you may not
<http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/RussButler/14W.htm>.
> http://nfs.nfshost.com/pics06/6K29/05.HTM
> 50/1.8 mij @~1.8
> The great cloud shots that Graham posts taught me to look up more often.
>
Terrific, great catch! Here, the highlights are in good shape, so the
tree detail is excellent.
> http://nfs.nfshost.com/pics06/6K29/15.HTM OM-4 24/2.8 ~1/2 sec. One of
> Christos' recent shots taught me that you can hold steady for a while.
>
I like the waterfalls a lot. 'Twere mine, I'd either crop off some of
the top or play with it's tonality. The bright trees and blown sky pull
the eye away from the primary subject, IMHO.
> Thanks for looking.
>
Thanks for the ride!
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|