Sorry, gents. NOT a DO. Just an IS.
That said, there are a wealth of reviews of both lenses at the FM
site. DO here:
http://tinyurl.com/cahc6
Bokeh is mentioned in a number of the reviews. Interestingly,
responses are both pro and con. Some of the respondents include links
to sample pix.
Non-DO here:
http://tinyurl.com/yap9zp
You will need to be registered to read them. Bottom line -- the
non-DO is preferred overall.
ScottGee1
On 12/9/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Me too. I'm interested in the bokeh. I saw an image posted once that
> showed concentric rings in the OOF parts of the image. Have you seen
> such things in your own photos?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Moose wrote:
>
> > ScottGee1 wrote:
> >
> >>...........
> >>
> >>For example, I made a few shots with my newly acquired 70-300. One at
> >>110mm and 1/6 sec is very sharp. The one that blows my mind was at
> >>300mm at 1/20 sec. has printed material in it. It holds up well when
> >>pixel-peeped at 100%!
> >>
> >
> > Is the the DO version? I'd be interested to hear more of your opinions
> > of the lens.
> >
> > Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|