Here is the one with Tamron 180 test, CA is also exist for Tamron but better
than OM180. On the other hand the boken of Tamron was not that good.
http://www.accura.com.hk/180T/Tamron180-40.html
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard Frangoulis" <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:37 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: OM 180/2.8 bokeh praised at RFF
> >4. The consensus of many users here over the years is that the 180/2.8
>>has more CA than is desirable for some uses and more than the 200/4,
>>200/5 and the Tamron 180/2.5. CH posted a clear example, but I've lost
>>the link to it.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/lenscom.htm
>
> Unfortunately, I got such CA with many pictures I did with the 180/2.8 and
> the OM-4.
>
> Bernard
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|