CA, however, is easily fixed in post processing unlike some other
optical maladies. Better, of course, that you don't have it in the
first place but it's easily repaired if you do.
Chuck Norcutt
swisspace wrote:
> I have just been testing my new tamron 80-200F2.8 against my 180F2 and
> am pleased to report that although sharpness is very similar, at least
> on the E1 ( I think I could do better with more time and a tripod
> instead of a monopod) - CA can be seen with the tamron but hardly
> noticable to non existant with the white zuiko, phew now I am glad I
> invested 10 times as much in that lens ;-)
>
> IanW
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Here is the one with Tamron 180 test, CA is also exist for Tamron but better
>> than OM180. On the other hand the boken of Tamron was not that good.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/180T/Tamron180-40.html
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|