Ah, I understand. I must compare what you have posted to what I
did. I was expecting some rollovers (even though you had written
that there were too many ... :-)) and nothing worked.
That explains why they looked so good: you had worked on them :-))
Thanks, Moose.
Chris
On 11 Jan 2007, at 11:13, Moose wrote:
> Chris Barker wrote:
>> Thanks, Moose.
>>
>> I shall be back to the birches before too long, but I took some 645
>> photos (finishing a roll) on the same occasion and I shall look with
>> interest to see whether I did any better with the composition with
>> the different camera. [interesting to note that my Bronica RF645 felt
>> almost diminutive after holding my E-1!]
>>
>> But what do I do with your web pages?
> Mulch? Bird cage lining? I don't know. :-)
>> Or were they just to consider under the general heading(s) of your
>> final para?
>>
> Sure. I don't know if it's really productive, but I enjoy working with
> other peoples photos. I like to think I learn things from it, as they
> present subjects, problems, strengths and weaknesses different than
> what
> I shoot, so I figure if I get into them, I learn how I might deal with
> similar subject matter when I encounter it. Also, I think it helps me
> develop my PS "muscles". But I wouldn't do it if it weren't fun.
>
>
snip
>
> I would, by the way, never have touched any of your images If I didn't
> like them first.
> Moose
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|