I had an experience with 135/2.8. Its closest focus length is 1.5m,
too long. I sold it upon I purchased 100/2. I think it's not as good
as for hiking photography since 1.5m closest focus length & no
floating element close-distance correction mechanism.
Anyway, thanks for your suggestion. ^^
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
在 19 Jan 2007 11:58 PM 時，James N. McBride 寫到：
>
> I usually carry the 135 f-2.8 and a wide angle such as the 24mm
> when hiking.
> The 135 might be more available. /jmac
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Tom Fenwick
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:51 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 85mm F2 MC
>
>
>
> Trying to be more helpful, if you want it for a light hiking lens the
> 100/2.8 is probably a good alternative... It's a good alternative
> anyway,
> just as small and light really, very similar performance, and the
> one stop
> smaller aperture wouldn't hold you back much out and about?
>
> Tom
>
> On 1/19/07, Tom Fenwick <super.wide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> What Wayne said! Sell an 85/2? That's crazy talk.
>>>
>>> Good luck though :-)
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|