Jim,
I have 35/2, 50/1.2, I think the quality of them are excellent. How's
the quality of image of 35-70/3.5-4.5? Is it as good as 85/2?
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
在 20 Jan 2007 2:34 AM 時，Jim Couch 寫到：
> Actually, if Michael is looking for a lightweight lens for
> backpacking/hiking, and can live with a bit slower & shorter lens
> at the
> long end the 35-70 3.5-4.5 is a great alternative - fairly readily
> available, very lightweight, and has a close focusing mode. (Olympus
> optimistically calls it Macro.) The 35-80, while a fine lens, is a bit
> of a tank!
>
> Jim
>
> Walt Wayman wrote:
>> An alternative might be the 35-80/2.8, but the chances of getting
>> one of those is just about nill. I'm thinking about locking mine
>> up in the safe. :-)
>>
>> Walt
>>
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|