I made no specific claim against Hassy lenses. It's just that larger
format lenses don't *have* to resolve as much as a 35mm lens since the
image doesn't have to be enlarged as much. Do you have some actual
resolution test data for Hassy and large format lenses that support you?
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Dr. Flash wrote:
>> Given that 2-1/4 medium format lenses normally don't have to
>> resolve as much detail as a 35mm lens it may be that the Hassy
>> could have as much or more trouble resolving them tiny
>> pixels as the Canyon glass.
>
> I'm not sure how that theory started, but I'll put *most* Hassy
> lenses up against 35mm lenses any day. And how about large format?
> There's some really awesome large-format lenses which really stomp
> that theory. However, if the theory IS TRUE, then the E-system
> should be far superior to Full-Frame 35mm format. Right?
>
> There's many reasons to select medium-format. Pixel-counts would be
> only one.
>
> AG
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|