I was answering the point about the distinction between Lightroom and
Photoshop. (sure, many if not all raw converters allow non-destructive
changes)
What Adobe have said is they'll draw the line on the features available in
Lightroom where they can no longer simply keep the changes non-destructive.
So for more complex edits you'll still need Photoshop.
br
Jez
On 1/31/07, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The other distinction I've heard (on Lightroom podcasts) is that it's
> > primarily for RAW processing and all work on an image done in
> > Lightroom is
> > non-destructive.
>
> It's bad enough that Microsoft copies Apple, but now Adobe!
>
> Apple's Aperture has been doing this for almost two years now.
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|