C.H.Ling wrote:
> I didn't notice the tree at the far side, the other area of the OOF
> backgroud was not that bad.
And yet not good enough to be promoted as an example of great bokeh, IMO.
> The Zuiko 50/1.2 and Le*ca 50/1 images I have seen were much poorer.
>
I have neither of those, but need not get so exotic and expensive. The
common Zuiko 50/1.8, has a problem similar to the 50/3.5, although not
quite as bad.. Wide open enough for selective focus, distant backgrounds
get ugly, stopped down the problem is much less
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/Home/5018bokeh.htm>.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|