Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Shutter speed requirements [was: 3x21 tele converter]

Subject: [OM] Re: Shutter speed requirements [was: 3x21 tele converter]
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:36:37 -0500
Hmmm.  A very long way from shutter speed requirements but well said.

Chuck Norcutt

Moose wrote:
> Jan Steinman wrote:
>> :::: The record is clear that left to their own devices, the  
>> automobile manufacturers lack the wisdom or the will or both to  
>> switch decisively to the production of inexpensive, compact, energy- 
>> saving cars appropriate to our present needs. -- Donald E. Weeden,  
>> 1975 ::::
>>   
> Some of your tag quotes are getting to long for my short attention span 
> for such things. And I've certainly missed several in threads I've not read.
> 
> This one interests me, as it assumes an economic and political system 
> that has never existed, especially in the US. That is, one in which 
> wisdom and the will to use it are in charge*. Certainly there are and 
> have been systems where what is marketed as wisdom is imposed on the 
> populace, often by force. Un-self interested and non-dogmatic wisdom? 
> Nah. (Yes, I did study international economics at Berkeley, but this 
> opinion is my own.)
> 
> Those few US auto makers of the past (this is an old quote) who tried 
> what he advocated either failed or mended their ways.
> 
> Those in trouble now due, but only partially,  to excess dependence on 
> large, fuel inefficient vehicles ,are in trouble as a result of a 
> misreading of the marketplace as it has changed.
> 
> The economic system under which those automakers operated and operate 
> puts wisdom and will in the hands of the public. Castigating them for 
> playing the hand they are dealt is at least disingenuous, if not simply 
> an outright lie told for political purposes..
> 
> Mr. Weeden, if he were being honest and not practicing demagoguery, 
> should have either castigated the wisdom and will of the people or come 
> right out and said that he would prefer a form of state socialism. That 
> is what is required for government and industry to limit the choices in 
> the marketplace to items deemed to be responsible and appropriate, by 
> whatever political, environmental, social, religious, etc. standards are 
> in place at the time. In fact, don't I recall a quote by il duce on that 
> very point, extolling fascism as the perfect combination of government 
> and industry, at the end of more than one of your posts?
> 
> And no, I am not advocating for or against any particular form of 
> economic or political organization, just pointing out when something is 
> logically inconsistent or worse, and probably disingenuous.
> 
> If you, Jan, want people who don't already agree with you to consider 
> your positions, you should vet the stuff you quote to avoid the 
> obviously absurd.
> 
> Moose - apparently shooting for at least his contrarian, if not 
> curmudgeon, merit badge.
> 
> * OK, maybe in some long ago benevolent dictatorships. Theoretically 
> enough of a possibility to be worthy of discussion, but not here and now.
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz