Point taken but in the interests of interest, I think we'll give it a
whirl anyway!
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 03/03/2007, at 2:21 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I don't think I made myself very clear. I was trying to imply that a
> mirror lens made specifically for a 4/3 body might allow a smaller
> hole
> in the primary mirror. That, in turn, would allow a primary mirror of
> smaller overall diameter and allow a shorter focal length than the
> typical 500/8.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|