Exactly! I've seen the Tamron 300mm that would be excellent for those
situations.
Allen
----Original Message Follows----
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Which lens would you choose
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:52:02 +0000
And that's why I kept mine even after I got the 300/2.8 Tamron. If the sun
is shining and I need to go 499 yards, it's a lot easier to tote.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Jim Couch <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The 300 f/4.5 is one very fine lens. Although not particularly fast, it
> is very sharp even wide open, which makes it more usable than some of
> the faster after market lenses.
>
> Jim
>
> Allen Coltrin wrote:
> > Hmmmmmmmmmm I need to think about this. I have my Oly 300mm/f4.5 but
it's a
> > bit longer and heavier than these lenses, true?
> >
> > Allen
> >
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
_________________________________________________________________
Win a Zune??make MSN® your homepage for your chance to win!
http://homepage.msn.com/zune?icid=hmetagline
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|