On 3/6/07, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SNIP!
>
> Michael isn't the deepest analytical thinker, and his casual attribution
> of the C failures to simple statistics doesn't really hold up.
Amen. As a reviewer, Michael is a good landscape photographer.
> The proportion idea is too simple. There's not enough data here to say for
> sure, but I suggest further possible explanations.
Lots of useful analysis here from Moose. Too bad all those folks
reading LL won't see it.
SNIP!
>
> Moose
ScottGee1
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|