Having dealt with 5 attorneys who each in my opinion demonstrated
that he/she was not conscientious and not diligent at their work and 2
more who may have been okay (but neither distinguished themselves with
their actions), I wasn't just forming my opinion on what I've heard
and read. Maybe California attracts the bottom of the barrel or maybe
the good ones here are too expensive to be hired by ordinary people.
On the other hand I was on a jury where the attorney defending the
doctor was clearly more diligent than the doctor. The plaintiff's
attorney didn't show up for the last day of the trial so there wasn't
much of a contest (he's not one of the 5 that I said I dealt with.)
-jeff
On 3/11/07, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know many attorneys (the correct spelling) who are decent, honest,
> conscientious and diligent at their work and really care about their clients.
> They get a bad rep because of a minority who are scumbags. Don't lump them
> all together. We could always tell one from another in about five minutes.
>
> And when did we get so PC here?
>
> Walt
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jeff Keller" <jeffreyrkeller@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Attornies are hired guns who know how to get away with murder. If
> > they're really good, they become policticians. There's an annual
> > expose of judges dismissing the parking tickets of attornies and
> > similar abuses of position. They are some of the last people I would
> > look to advice unless I wanted to get away with something that I
> > thought was generally considered wrong.
> >
> >
> > -jeff
> >
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|