Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Panny sensors?

Subject: [OM] Re: Panny sensors?
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:29:58 +1100
Smaller Panasonic sensors are very poor at higher ISO, often to the  
point of being unuseable at 400ISO. Panasonic have been particularly  
incompetent in rectifying this deficiency. Note that I mean small  
sensor, not small camera. It might be acceptable in the compact  
market but not with something like the FZ series. It is possible to  
make a small sensor with outstanding low-light performance, as in the  
Fujifilm F30.
  It is annoying given that they are often rebadged as Leicas, often  
have Leica lenses and are usually very well designed, robust cameras  
with great features. The usual way of dealing with this is to use  
aggressive in-camera processing that the user may be unaware of until  
they try to 'improve' their shots in Photoshop and find that they are  
already on the edge of what is possible and can't be pushed any  
further. Leica uses its own firmware (processing engine) or tweaks  
the Panasonic one but still can't get around that speed limitation.
I just bought myself a Leica D-Lux 3 (Panasonic LX2) because it is a  
brilliant walk-around compact but it annoys me that I won't be able   
to use it sensibly for much but outdoor work. That is frustrating but  
at least it now has RAW.
It was something of an unfair comment by me originally because the  
E-330 chip is excellent at higher speed but as a school photographer  
told me a couple of weeks ago, they like the E1 not just for  
robustness but because of the skin tones. That will probably be lost  
now with the replacement.
Hope that's not too sesquipedalian for you - but anyone who can use a  
word like that deserves all they get. :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 14/03/2007, at 3:20 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:

>
> OK, so I notice upon return from work some disparaging comments about
> the news that the E-Thing may have a Panasonic sensor. Can anyone
> explain to me, without going totally techno-sesquipedalian on me, why
> this shows a bad thing?
>
> Many thanx!
>
> --Bob
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz