Windor wrote:
> The thing I carried away was that a simple couple of puffs from an
> air bulb is amazingly more effective than any of them.
That was quite intruiging to me too. I've got a couple of grubbies
on my E-1 that could stand a blast or two of air. I'd suggest
though, that the dust shakers are probably more effective at KEEPING
a sensor clean vs cleaning the sensor.
Another thing that I observed was the out-of-focus nature of dust on
the E-system. That membrane is far enough away from the sensor to
reduce a lot of dust issues--unless, of course, you happen to be
using a pin-hole cap for a lens.
http://image66media.com/Gallery/IsleRoyale01/P9056303040
That, btw, is from an E-1 used for 18 months that has NEVER been
cleaned. :) Those two dark ones will only show up when stopped down
to F22.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|