There is a school of thought that claims that it is better to 'get it
right' in the camera, to capture the maximum amount of correct
information in the shoot rather than stuff around too much on the
pooter. Blending multiple shots may also involve compromises and I
can imagine situations where it would be bloody near impossible.
Leica heroically redefined the IR problem as an advantage for B&W
work. How dare we complain!
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 22/04/2007, at 8:56 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:
> I know of some fairly serious landscape photographers that still use
> graduated neutral density filters with their state of the art digital
> cameras and I scratch my head. Seems to me that if you have time to
> mess with adjusting such a filter you might as well take two
> exposures without it and merge them much more accurately later.
>
> I thought it was IR filtering that was too weak on the Leica M8.
> There was a similar problem with the Nikon D2H, though not as bad. A
> "hot mirror" filter became the correction of choice.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|