hi Bob,
I've just received a printed images from picture I made recently with
a E-410 (not yet a production one as they are not yet available in
Belgium) and for me it's really a good result for such a sensitivity,
and a "so little sensor" :)
Picture was made with the low light of a reception lounge: 1600 iso
1/20th and F/2.9 with the 50~200 at 108mm.
I've uploaded the pictures at:
http://gallery120749.fotopic.net/c1280636.html
same picture, straight from the camera and second one with a little bit
of curves in Photoshop and some noise reduction with NeatImage. that's
this one I've made printed at 20x30 cm and for me this printed image
is promising.
regards
marc
bois-de-villers, belgium
Bob Whitmire a écrit :
> It's very difficult to believe ISO 1600 is as clean as it looks in
> these shots. I hope some of our uber-tech gearheads can explain to me
> why what appears to be so clean actually isn't. Yeah, I zoomed and
> looked at the grill cover, and 1600 shows a good bit more noise than
> 100, but my guess still is that if I bought one of these camera and
> printed up an 11x14 shot at ISO 1600 I'd be more than a little bit
> disappointed.
>
> Still, I've been wrong before. And if I'm wrong this time, the 510,
> and the ever-promised E-Thing might be something to crow about.
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> www.bobwhitmire.com
>
>
>
> On May 15, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Phil wrote:
>
>
>> This guy has posted a series of shots with the new 410, he is a
>> regular on
>> the forum, the 1600 ISO shots
>> look pretty good to me
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?
>> forum=1022&thread=23234806
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|