You're right. I dunno - it wasn't even that late... I've corrected
it now; thanks.
Tom
On 19/05/07, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom Fenwick wrote:
> > I think there are two things going on - the noise reduction function
> > is set on but probably not doing anything, and there is some noise
> > reduction smoothing going on in the image processing; it's not obvious
> > unless you can look at the files side by side (or unless Moose makes a
> > rollover demonstration...), but the raw file is way sharper and a bit
> > grittier.
> >
> Tom, I started to do that yesterday, overlaid and aligned the images.
> But whether something else in going on or you have the labels reversed
> on your web page, in each case, the image labeled RAW is softer, with
> both less defined noise and less image detail than the one labeled JPG.
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|