Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8

Subject: [OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:06:07 -0700
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> some component of a lubricant. Who knows. But it is a unique problem 
>> with this one OM lens.
> The problem doesn't sound dissimilar to that of the problem rear element of 
> the Zuiko 8/2.8 FishEye.
>   
I thought that was documented fungus? Something about many of the only 
batch made being stored in inappropriate conditions?

Or just bad memory. :-)

Moose

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz